The War Of Terror

Every added a piece of factual information with numerous references to Wikipedia and found that someone discretely removed after a short while?

Ever wondered if the true reason was that someone felt the information was too relevant and too important to let the general public know about it? Or simply found that the only plausible reason for the information being removed was that it simply went against everything your government and predominant media would have people believe?

9/11 is a great was to test just how strictly censored Wikipedia projects really are and who actually removes factual information that goes against everything the predominant media would have people believe. The demolition of the three WTC towers are now so well documented, so obvious, so undeniable fact that removing the fact is a clear giveaway of a government-payed CoIntelPro terrorist. Such terrorist vary, some pretend to be writers or political activist and spend their whole life doing CoIntelPro, others are just stupid Hitler-Jugend students looking for a hand-out. Others pretend to work some regular government job while they in reality are working for the military or an intelligence agency. But regardless of cover: they all have one thing in common. They tend to attempt to get themselves into positions where they are best suited to spread disinformation and restrict the flow of true and factual information.

Many 9/11 researches have tried to edit the English Wikipedia and found that it is over-run by governemtn CoIntelPro terrorist who replace factual information with provable lies, including:

• James H. Fetzer – What it Doesn’t Say about Scholars for 9/11 Truth
• James Bacque – “Why is Wikipedia Censoring Me?”
• Philip D. Zelikow – From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
• Ashton Carater, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow – Catastrophic Terrorism

It is clear from my own experience and numerous other people that the English Wikipedia project is tightly regulated and has absolutely no room for true and factual objective information.

How about localized Wikipedia projects?

I tried to add some factual referenced material to the Norwegian Wikipedia project  no.wikipedia.org) a year ago and found that it was removed immediately, without a comment, with out any explanation or reason. And worse, the IP address I was using got banned just for adding factual information.

I decided to look into this now, a year later, to find out just how strict the censorship really is at the Norwegian Wikipedia project and also exactly who does the censorship.

A dozen or so removed edits later, guess what I found?

The administrators are the only ones who edit away factual information, and they consequently block the users, and IPs, who add factual information with references. Then they remove the facts and replace it with blatant lies who violate basic laws of physics.

These guys all know the truth about 9/11 and are desperately trying to cover it up at the Norwegian Wikipedia by blocking users who tell the truth followed by discrete removals of factual information:

• Eystein Jarp, born 1980-07-10, using the nickname “Opus”, quickly removes all factual information without giving any reaons and blocks the users afterwards.
• Peter J. Acklan, 1970-03-13, using the nickname Pjacklam, also quickly removes factual information. This guy actually tries to reason his removals using blaitant lies.
• John Erling Blad – Removes all factual information and seems to think it is very dangerous to allow anyone to even think of editing without prior approval. Instantly removes any factual information about 9/11.
• Marius Lervik (1984-01-10), using the nickname Mariule, blocked an edit with 16 references after – get ready for this one – 1 minute. Talk about a fast reader checking facts and references at record speeds! This made me re-post the edit, with all the references. Peter J. Acklan, also apparently a fast reader, removed these particular edits again after 7 minutes.
• Jan Bojer Vindheim, born 1945, is a specially interesting blatantly censuring administrator. This because he has supposedly been a peace activist and globalism protestor all his life and I actually admired this guy when I was younger. However, a close-up inspection of his website http://www.vindheim.net/ reveals numerous almost subliminal references to how big a threat fundamentalistic islamic terrorist are and how Al-Qaida has been behind every government terrorist act carrried out the last decade. This raises the interesting question: Why would someone supposedly interested in stopping global tyrannical government be desperately supporting the official 9/11 myth? Is he active in peace organizations to get something done, or to make sure they don’t get anything done and never ask the hard questions?

It is interesting to note that the only one above who even attempted to justify removing factual information was Peter J. Acklan, an admitted government employe of Avinor – who happen to be closely connected to the Royal Norwegian Airforce and the Norwegian military…

He had this to say about five references added with information about the destruction of the WTC towers:

“Your sources are websites with authors who do not even tell who they are. They are not very reliable.”

Judge for yourself.

The five web pages in question where:

• Why the world trade center had to explode – http://www.crispinsartwell.com/wtc.htm

It does not take much to find http://www.crispinsartwell.com/bio.htm at that site, which states that it is authored by Crispin Sartwell.

• How the Towers were Demolished – http://gordonssite.tripod.com/index.html

Gordon J. Ross, strangely enough, does not give his name anywhere on the website. But he does provide his e-mail address, and anyone genuily interessted could easily have e-mailed and asked. Although, that would probably not be needed to an observant person because this document was also used as a reference in the edit in question:

• Craig T. Furlong and Gordon Ross, Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth – http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc

By Craig T. Furlong and Gordon Ross. Right there on the refence. Yet Wikipedia-administrator Peter J. Acklan tries to claim that the sources are documents written anonymous people and are therefore not reliable?

• A Refutation of the Official Collapse theory – http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.htm

Dr. Judy Wood, “professor of Mechanical Engineering”. Clearly stated right there on the page. You would have to be blind not to see it, if you actually visit that page. You would also have to be blind and dumb-as-a-cow to not realize that the official government story is impossible – if you actually read the information on that site.

And the last, reference, “by anonymous people”, get ready for this one:

• Page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report – http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch9.htm

This page actually states that the buildings collapsed in 10 seconds. Right there on the government page. So what? Everybody knows that. Everybody?

The problem with that particular page on the 9/11 Commission is that the “official” story the administrators of the Norwegian Mediawiki website are trying to push is that the buildings gradually weakened and fell down very slowly. Yes. Most of the administrators just blatantly removes factual information, and then administrator Jan Bojer Vindheim re-writes history and puts in their version of the redicilous government story – which is, oddly enough, an even more outragous rose-red fairy-tale than the official US government story.

They are actually, seriously, trying to push that the buildings collapsed almost immediately after the aircraft hit the buildings and remove the simple extremely-well-documented undisputed fact that WTC1 and WTC2 stood standing for 56 and 102 minutes before the demolition (and they also, obviously, consequently hide the fact that the actual demolitions, or “collapse” as they call it, only took 8.4 and 10.2 seconds).

So there you have it. The Norwegian Wikipedia is run by a few fascist – excuse the strong term, but that is the most accurate description – who even remove references to the official 9/11 commission report in order to promote their own even-more-whitewashed rose-red version of the offial story!

Oh. Just some advice. Use a privacy-protecting system like Tor if you want to attempt to edit Wikipedia – specially if you want to add factual information to small localized Wikipedia projects. You never know who’s running them, and the above administrators of the Norwegian Wikipedia are highly suspect – to put it gently.

Technorati Tags: Wikipedia, Wikis, Wiki, Censorship, 9/11, 911