The War Of Terror

ALEX JONES: END GAME: BLUEPRINT FOR GLOBAL ENSLAVEMENT is ready and you and your friends will shortly have access to this new documentary at all your local friendly peer to peer networks. You will, when released, be free to copy and share this video with friends, loved ones, strangers and speically people in the miilitary and police.

This is a flash version of the “End Game” trailer:

alex_jones_-_endgame_-_trailer.flv

XViD & DVD versions will be available at most torrent sites shortly. You can, and should, share Alex Jones videos freely. You are free to share them, and most factual documentaries regarding the “war on terror”, with everybody. All the talk about “piracy” is a distraction, peer to peer is attacked because it allows free alternative information to be distributed on a global scale.

It is slightly unclear exactly what date all p2p networks will be flooded with “End Game”, but it will be very soon.

There is a screening at Alamo South Lamar on September 17th.

The police in Canada first denied having police provocateurs who were trying to disrupt peaceful demonstrations at the North American leaders summit.

Then the following shocking videofootage, taken 20. august 2007 by Paul Manly, got slightly less than 300.000 views at YouTube over at YouTube:

Stop SPP Protest – Union Leader stops provocateurs

Eventually even the police understood that the video evidence is overwhelming and can not be denied.

The police in Canada have now admitted that yes, the police really were carrying out acts of terrorism against the general population.

North American Union

• Why do you think the CFR are so hell-bendt on hurding the people of the United States of America, Canada and Mexico into a facsist super-state called The North American Union?
• And why is it so important for the power elite to stop all demonstrations against “North American Union” treason?
• Do you really want to be the property of a totally undemocratic facsist superstate which they plan to create by merging NAU & EU?

United for truth website story regarding what it will be about is this:

The main theme is about the slow but certain disappearance of democracy and free press in the world. About people rushing and working to earn a little money, to serve a small group of very rich people. Very rich people that understand as no other how modern slavery works. About the lies they try to (subliminally) push into our brains. About state-sponsored terrorism, police state control. About governments serving big international companies, while reducing its own population to dust. About letting fear – it can happen to you too – make people have a common enemy. About the fact that mobile phones, digital TV’s and an information super-highway are mistakenly associated with an increase of freedom and civil rights. About waking up, standing up, asking questions and demanding answers to those who let us pay to be part of this circus. About being tired of being called anti-globalists and anarchists, while just using our common sense. About…
you participating in this. We won’t change the world today, we won’t change it tomorrow, but we will most likely – whether we or they want it or not – change it for the sake of our children.

The demonstration is something you may want to participate in if you don’t like false-flag state-sponsored terrorism carried out by the local regime’s army or intelligence agencie, the current near-global police state, censorship and apparently a whole range issues such as digital television sets.

Belgium is within the fascist EU police state, so you only need some form of ID to travel there if you and your country are property of the EU Corporation.
Official beta website for the event is http://www.virb.com/unitedfortruth. This website features an image with information regarding Denmarks’ constitution.

The US constitution has been described by US Dictator George W. Bush as “a goddamn piece of paper“. It looks very much like his partners in crime, such as previous and current puppet dictators in EU’s various provinces like Tony Blair, Fredrik Reinsfeldt and Jens Stoltenberg, all agree that they and their gestapo “intelligence agencies” terrorist are above all laws and that killing and torturing their citizens is a alright thing to do in order to rule the people.

If you like things like freedom of speech, peace and constitutions then perhaps Unitedfortruth is somewhere you want to be September 9th 2007.

The New York Post has a story in their “gossip” section where they mention that broad-way star Christine Ebersole is now among the many public figures who point out that 9/11 was an inside job. They do slander her by calling her a “kook”, but still, they do quote what she actually said:

“I think we want to look at our government as sort of like a benevolent father that’s going to take care of us and be kind to us and treat us well, and I think it’s too much for our people to conceptualize, and I’m sure that’s what happened to people in Nazi Germany,”

You can support her and read more about her at her website http://christineebersole.com/

Here is the actual interview with her (thanks to truthcult.com):

Christine Ebersole 9/11 interview

The war of terror is a strange mix of state-sponsored terrorism, psychological warfare, war on the truth and a endless matrix of misinformation designed to keep those who are seeking the truth occupied with matters of minor importance.

Information warfare is one of the most important aspects of the war of terror which is currently waged by the NATO alliance against the population of all NATO-countries, and NATO-partner countries, and the world in general.

Control of information is of major importance in information warfare. Few people are aware that the west has a very high degree of censorship – because that is among the subjects who’s censoring has the highest priority.

The 23rd Chaos Computer Club Congress which took place late December had quite a few interesting talks regarding censorship. Two comes to mind:

“Tor and China” (23C3-1444-en-tor_and_china.m4v, ftp, 362 MB) and
“The worst part of censorship is XXXX” (censorship-t3s2.wmv, ftp, 277 MB)

Both of these lectures are highly interesting and worth viewing. They are both about censorship in China and how you can by-pass it. They are both about how China limits people’s access to websites who contain given keywords, and the methods who can be used to bypass their censorship.

However, there is one vital aspect of Internet censorship which is sort of ignored by both these talks, security experts, computer experts and most people in general:

If you can control all the information an individual has access to then you can control their perceived reality.

How do people get access to the information on the Internet? Sometimes friends tell recommend websites in person, by e-mail, IM, and so on, but the majority of sites visited on the Internet are accessed using search engines.

First, some terms. The indexable web is the part of the Internet which search-engines are able to visit and index. The visible web is the part of the web which shows up in major search-engines, and the deep web are websites who, because of password-protection and so on, can’t be indexed.

Every single one of todays major search-engines are admittedly censoring localized search-engines. This is now close to common knowledge because of headlines such as “Bill Gates Defends Google’s Censorship In China” at Slashdot (Notice how this is the head of the corporation who are making the worlds most used operating system who is saying that it is alright for the biggest search engine corporation, Google, and his own corporation, Microsoft, to censor if the local government asks that it is done).

So there is no question that search engines are censoring. It is admitted. They haven’t admitted to doing it in supposedly “free” countries such as the NATO-countries, but most major search-engines have been cought.

You have to ask yourself: Are they censoring in countries in “the free” western world? If so, to what degree are they censoring? The answers to these questions are yes and unknown. You’re naive if you think that what major search-engines present as the visible web includes everything which is available on the indexable web.

If you understand this then your first question is probably so what can we do? (or: is resistance futile?).

Luckily there are some clever German Open-Source developers who have taken the matter into their own hands.

They have developed a free and open-source Java-based P2P search-engine called “YaCy“. It is a computer program you install on your computer which allow you to search the web. It also crawls the web and stores a small portion of the index on your computer. Searching is done by your program contacting the other peers who are also running the same software. This clever method allows your local YaCy-program to search the entire web without knowing about more than a very small portion of it.

There are two draw-backs of using a local P2P program such as “YaCy“: 1) It runs in the background and uses resources (if you do not have a dedicated server) and 2) It does take longer to search, because of the time it takes to ask the other peers for the search-results.

But YaCy also has a major feature which you simply can’t get in any other search-engine:

• You can not censor the search-results.
• Again: You can not censor the search-results.

This censor-ship resistance, and this alone, makes YaCy the search-engine of the future. There is no central point where you can censor the search-results.

You can censor what your YaCy crawls, and you can censor what search-results are shown in your YaCy program. But you – or anyone else – can not say “http://blahblahblah.tdl/? We don’t like that one. Nobody is allowed to know that it exists.”. If some peer has indexed a site then it doesn’t make much different if 5 or 10 YaCy-peers are blocking it.

Free software is about freedom, not price. You can be sure that the YaCy-software respects your freedom. You have no idea what is really going on inside the big corporation(s) who are operating todays largest search-engines. Are you 100% sure your favorite search-engine are not deliberately censoring away websites just because they may contain information which goes against what they (or the local government) would have people believe? Do you really want to take that chance?

Now you know. There is a way to take back the web:

Simply run your own search-engine. It’s easy. Just download and install your personal copy of YaCy and become a peer in the global web-search P2P.

Or use the web-version: YacySearch. It runs the very same YaCy-software you get if you download and install your own local copy. But remember this minor detail: You can’t be 100% sure that the YaCy installation running at YacySearch does not feature a blacklist, but you can verify that your personal copy of YaCy does not censor or have a blacklist if you download a copy from http://www.yacy.net/yacy/, check the source and run your very own search-engine on your own computer. It’s free. It’s open-source. It’s easy to use. Get used to the idea that it probably will become just as normal to run a P2P search-engine as it is to run P2P file-sharing programs, a web browser, and so on.

• YacySearch – a search-engine running YaCy, try before you “buy” (or in this case, install for free)
• http://www.yacy.net/yacy/ – Official website for the YaCy software.

Technorati Tags: Search-engines, Search, Technology, Web, Internet, censorship

A schoolboy broke his teachers window while filming it, and then put the film on the Internet (at Youtube). Now NASUWT, one of hte many teaching unions in the UK, are asking for legislation to control the internet.

From the article:

“Unfortunately, any yob or vandal can now have their 15 minutes of fame, aided and abetted by readily accessible technology and irresponsible internet sites which enable such behaviour to be glorified. [The general secretary of the union] said the union supported a zero tolerance approach in schools to pupils who used technology to abuse and undermine teachers, and called for more rigorous legislative control of internet sites which gave them license.”

Teachers are generally known to teach false information in UK schools, specially regarding history, so it comes as no suprise that they want the Internet censored. As for the schoolkid who broke his teachers window on video: They should be glad he was stupid enough to videotape it and upload the evidence to the Internet. If every bank-robber was equally stupid then solving crimes like that would take no time at all…

As for censorship: Download and start using Tor if you have not done so already. It allows you to both read and publish on the Internet anonymously. This would not have helped the schoolkid who filmed himself, since that is a dead give-away of who you are, but it is a generally a very good thing to be able to express yourself without fear of being tortured – which is far more common than most people think in most NATO-countries.

Information wants to be free. Laws who try to stop it are not good solutions, they are the instrument of fascism.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is famous for the Pancake Theory v2.0, which, like FEMAs Pancake Theory v1.0, explains that a few small fires made the once mighty world trade centers turn into a fine dust and a pile of pulverized remains in ten seconds (NIST claims that their Pancake Theory v2.0, written by mostly the same people who wrote the FEMA report, is not the Pancake Theory – because they use slightly different, but equally ridiculous, claims to explain that fire and damage cased the destruction of the WTC buildings..).

On December 5th NIST Technical Guidelines Development Committee met and rejected guidelines that would require a paper trail to be made by voting machines.

A federal advisory group rejected a measure yesterday that would have discouraged states from using electronic voting systems that lack an independent means of verifying their results, according to a spokeswoman for the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Members of the Technical Guidelines Development Committee, a group created by Congress to advise the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, deadlocked 6 to 6 on the proposal at a meeting held at the NIST headquarters in Gaithersburg. Eight votes are needed to pass a measure on the 15-member committee.

Federal Panel Rebuffs Guidelines That Insist on a Paper Trail, Washington Post

There is absolutely no way of making any kind of software based voting machine even remotely secure, and the whole point of using them seems to be to control the outcome of elections… A paper trail would at least help a tad, but not much – but apparently, even that would be too dangerous for the corrupt & criminal people at NIST..

Technorati Tags: Voting machines, NIST